Legal Opinion
Brooks v. East Chambers Consolidated Independent School District
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 23, 1989No. Civ. A. G-88-379PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUGH GIBSON, District Judge.
East Chambers County Consolidated Independent School District approved a plan in August 1988 to require students in grades six through twelve who wish to participate in school-sponsored extra-curricular activities to consent to urinalysis for drugs as a condition to their participation in those activities. On November 1, 1988, the plaintiff Brent Brooks, a senior at East Chambers High School, challenged the constitutionality of the district’s drug testing program in a class action suit in this Court. The plaintiff, who participates in the high…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. RaabCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- University of Colorado Ex Rel. University of Colorado v. DerdeynSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Acton v. Vernonia School District 47JDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1992
- Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Anonymous Fireman v. City of WilloughbyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Earls ex rel. Earls v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.