Legal Opinion
Earls ex rel. Earls v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School District
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2001No. 00-6128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Lindsay Earls and Daniel James are students at Tecumseh High School.1 By their next friends and parents, John David and Lori Earls and Leta Hagar, they brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Board of Education of . the Tecumseh Public School District and the Tecumseh Public School District (collectively the “District”), challenging the constitutionality of the random suspicion-less urinalysis drug testing policy which the District implemented for all students participating in competitive extracurricular activities. The district court…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Theodore v. Delaware Valley School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- In re D.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Earls v. Board Of Education Of Tecumseh Public School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Penn-Harris-Madison School Corp. v. JoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Michele C. Taylor v. Alabama IntertribalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001