Legal Opinion
Acton v. Vernonia School District 47J
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 7, 1992No. Civ. 91-1154-MAPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARSH, Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this action for declaratory and injunctive relief claiming that the Vernonia School District’s drug testing policy violates their son’s rights under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 9 of the Oregon Constitution. The following constitutes my findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52.
FACTS
I. Background
Vernonia, Oregon, is a small logging community of approximately 3000 persons including all those living within or near the city limits. Plaintiffs Wayne and Judy Acton reside in Vernonia and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- University of Colorado Ex Rel. University of Colorado v. DerdeynSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- State of Iowa v. Mar'yo D. Lindsey Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Miller v. WilkesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.