Legal Opinion

Admiral Oriental Line v. Atlantic Gulf & Oriental S. S. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 17, 1937No. 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

After this cause went back to the District Court, a question arose as to in*27terest and costs. The United States contends that it cannot be liable for either because the recovery was under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505), which does not allow them. It also objects to an attorney’s allowance of $100, which, though proper in admiralty, is not at common law. This motion is to clear up these points. As to the original action of the Admiral Oriental Line against the Atlantic Gulf & Oriental Steamship Company, there can be no doubt that the judgment should include interest and costs, although, as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Minturn v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1855

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. Conners Marine Co. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Garcia & Diaz, Inc. v. Empresa Naviera De Cuba, S. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  4. Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API