Legal Opinion

Conners Marine Co. v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 21, 1945No. 84PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion disposing of the merits we held the United States liable to the Petterson Company, not in the admiralty, but under the Tucker Act, § 41(20), Title 28, U.S.C.A., and the Petterson Company now asks for costs in this court under § 258, Title 28, U.S.C.A. That statute limits costs in a proceeding under the Tucker Act to the amounts “actually incurred for witnesses and for summoning the same and fees paid to the clerk of the court”; and the Fifth Circuit, in United States v. Jacobs, 63 F.2d 326, held that this language did not cover appeals, which remained subject to its local rule,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Jacobs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Admiral Oriental Line v. Atlantic Gulf & Oriental S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  5. United States v. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Broadhurst v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. The Everett FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. American President Lines, Ltd. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. Broadhurst v. DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF EMP. SEC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Daitz Flying Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API