Peralta Shipping Corp. v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Justice Blacken, with whom Justice Marshall joins,
dissenting.
The admiralty jurisdiction of the federal courts extends generally to a transaction that “‘relates to ships and vessels, masters and mariners, as the agents of commerce.’” Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U. S. 731, 736 (1961), quoting 1 E. Benedict, Admiralty 131 (6th ed. 1940). Notwithstanding the broad sweep of the admiralty jurisdiction, this Court, since the time of its single-page opinion in Minturn v. Maynard, 17 How. 477 (1855), has refused to extend admiralty jurisdiction to disputes involving general agency contracts that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Costas Hadjipateras, Nicholas Hadjipateras and Dimitri Dracos v. Pacifica, S. A., and George TsakalotosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Minturn v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- The Hinkins Steamship Agency, Inc. v. Freighters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.