Legal Opinion

Beckett v. Roderick

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 21, 1969PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFRESNE, Justice.

On Appeal. Excepting Beckett, Leland, Bonville, Fernald and Favour who were dropped as parties by motion under Rule 21, M.R.C.P., and Sweet and Small who at argument were said to have accepted teacher contracts with other school authorities making their present claim moot, the remaining plaintiffs are all teachers who had acquired tenure under 20 M.R.S.A., § 161(5) within the school system of their respective towns of Bar Harbor, Mount Desert and Southwest Harbor. The legal voters of these 3 towns and of the Town of Tremont duly accepted, in referendum elections properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McGary v. BarrowsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  2. Benson v. Inhabitants of NewfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  3. Larson v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1945
  4. Inhabitants of North Berwick v. State Board of EducationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  5. Parker v. TitcombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Kilmore v. Erie InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. McKellar v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API