Albemarle Educational Foundation, Inc. v. Basnight
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
The question presented is whether plaintiff’s evidence, taken in the light most favorable to it, presents facts sufficient to justify a jury in finding that the parties had created a binding contract.
Defendant does not contest the existence of an offer. It is established law that an acceptance, unless otherwise specified, may be communicated by any means sufficient to manifest assent. 1 Corbin on Contracts, 1963 Ed., § 67, p. 275; American Law Institute, Restatement of Contracts, §§ 61, 64, pp. 67, 70. On this basis, the letter of 17 August 1967 could be found to constitute an acceptance of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Leaksville-Spray Institute v. MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Cherokee County v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Exum v. . LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Forstmann v. CulpDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Executive Leasing Associates, Inc. v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Bank of North Carolina, N.A. v. Investors Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Britt v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.