Britt v. Allen
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CARSON, Judge.
While the plaintiff was attempting to testify concerning her verbal contract with the defendant, the defendant objected to almost every question propounded by plaintiffs’ attorney. Most of the objections were sustained on the grounds that the questions were leading. While some of the questions were impermissively leading, others were proper in form and should have been allowed. It would be of no benefit to relate here all of the questions asked by plaintiffs’ attorney and the objections entered in response thereto. Suffice it to say that the plaintiff should have been allowed to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Carolina Helicopter Corp. v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Stonestreet v. Southern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Albemarle Educational Foundation, Inc. v. BasnightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Strange v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Britt v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975