Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Marion County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 4, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Marion County Circuit Court which judicially reviewed and then affirmed Marion County Ordinance No. 278, a rezoning ordinance passed by the Marion County Board of Commissioners. The circuit court found that the rezoned area did constitute spot zoning, but sustained the Commission’s decision because:

“* * the Board of County Commissioners in their hearings had ample evidence from which they could conclude, that the proposed zone change was proper although a deviation from the interim ‘holding’ ordinance and they supported their findings by proper…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Roseta v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Smith v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Archdiocese of Portland v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  2. Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API