Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Marion County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 4, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
This appeal is taken from a judgment of the Marion County Circuit Court which judicially reviewed and then affirmed Marion County Ordinance No. 278, a rezoning ordinance passed by the Marion County Board of Commissioners. The circuit court found that the rezoned area did constitute spot zoning, but sustained the Commission’s decision because:
“* * the Board of County Commissioners in their hearings had ample evidence from which they could conclude, that the proposed zone change was proper although a deviation from the interim ‘holding’ ordinance and they supported their findings by proper…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Page Et Ux. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Roseta v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Smith v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Archdiocese of Portland v. County of WashingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bd. of Sup'rs of Fairfax Cty. v. HorneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975