Howard v. Oroville School District
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte ' County and from an order refusing a new trial. K. S. Mahon, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought to quiet title to a small parcel of land within the townsite of Oroville described in the complaint as “situated on Bird Street adjoining the water-ditch and the Oroville school property on the west, and being a strip of land, or part of lot numbered eight in block number twenty-five and about forty feet in width, in back, and fifteen feet in front, running along said ditch north and south, as laid down in the official original map of said town of Oroville, now on file in the recorder’s office of Butte County, state of California.” The description, thus given, is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Board of Education v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Visalia v. JacobCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- County of Yolo v. BarneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- County of Placer v. Lake Tahoe Railway & Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Brown v. Board of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969
- Opinion No. (1998), California Attorney General Reports1998