Legal Opinion

Hatch v. Bastian

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1977No. 14784PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Millie Hatch sued the defendants Kenneth and Patricia Bastían seeking recission or reformation of a Warranty Deed by which she had conveyed farm lands in Uintah County to them. (She also joined as defendants the United Farm Agency and O. B. Oberhansley, real estate agency and broker who had handled the transaction, alleging improprieties in respect to such services. But for reasons not material here, they are not parties to this appeal.) Upon a trial to the court, it made findings and entered judgment in favor of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals, contending that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Burton v. Zion's Cooperative Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Barker v. DunhamUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Citizens Casualty Company of New York v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Ingram v. ForrerUtah Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horton v. HortonUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Mabey v. Kay Peterson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bown v. LovelandUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hottinger v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API