Legal Opinion

Horton v. Horton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1984No. 18712PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

Defendant Majestic Investment Company of Denver dba Majestic Mortgage Company (Majestic) appeals from a district court judgment setting aside a quitclaim deed from plaintiff Dwaine C. Horton to defendant Virginia Horton as void ab initio. Majestic also appeals a determination that plaintiff’s interest in the subject property has priority over Majestic’s interest. We affirm.

During their marriage, plaintiff Dwaine C. Horton and defendant Virginia H. Horton acquired a house in Bountiful, Utah. In December 1977, as part of a divorce decree, Mrs. Horton was awarded title to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum & Transport Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Sugarhouse Finance Co. v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Del Porto v. NicoloUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Taylor v. Gasor, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Bown v. LovelandUtah Supreme Court · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Acton v. DeliranUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. DeBry v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Christensen & Jensen, P.C. v. Barrett & DainesUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. RHN CORP. v. VeibellUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hill v. Estate of AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API