Legal Opinion

Stuht v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1916No. 12852PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered January 12, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on an automobile insurance policy.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is an action upon a policy of automobile insurance. The complaint, after setting out the terms of the policy, alleged that, on August 9, 1913, the insured automobile was wrecked and destroyed through a collision between the automobile and the wooden planking constituting a portion of the sluice box at the side of the roadway and projecting into the highway, and by striking and colliding with a tree near the roadway, and striking violently the ground near the roadway then being traveled by the machine, to the damage of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000.

The amended answer of the defendant…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Southern Casualty Co. v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API