Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Paul

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1923No. 6 Div. 856PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Plaintiff, appellee here, was the owner of what is referred to as a cut-down Pord car, with a specially designed body and some extra equipment. He had an insurance policy with defendant company insuring against actual loss or damage to his automobile “resulting solely from accidental collision of such automobile with any moving or stationary object.” On the night of February 4, 1921, at about 9 o’clock, the plaintiff with a companion, was returning in this car to the city of Birmingham from Edgewood Park, some few miles from the city. He was driving on what is known as the Montgomery Highway…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  4. Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API