Legal Opinion

State v. Putnam

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 2, 1982No. 8728-2-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.

Defendants Patrick Putnam and Calvin Hiatt appeal the judgments and sentences entered upon their convictions by a jury of the crimes of promoting prostitution in the second degree and criminal conspiracy. We reverse the criminal conspiracy convictions and affirm the convictions for promoting prostitution in the second degree.

As the result of a King County Police investigation of two businesses suspected of being fronts for prostitution, the Kinky Korner (Korner) and the American Sexuality Society (Society), Putnam and Hiatt were arrested and charged by second amended information with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. RoybalWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. CannWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Darrel Paterson Simpson, Robert MacRiner Anderson, and James Roy FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. Nathan D. Alexander, Ii, and Amy Gepfert v. Joseph DeangeloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. State v. TookesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API