Legal Opinion

State v. Pleasant

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 9, 1984No. 6353-1-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrie, J.

Defendant, Jack Pleasant, appeals the trial court's denial of his post-trial motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial. This appeal stems from Pleasant's conviction of selling marijuana to a paid agent of the Tacoma Police Department and an officer of the Tacoma Police Department who were conducting a "sting" operation. On appeal, the defendant contends that he was wrongfully convicted and accordingly entitled to arrest the judgment because (1) the jury erroneously disregarded his entrapment defense, (2) the sting operation violated his right to due process, o,r, alternatively, (3) he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. John Bagnariol, United States of America v. Gordon L. Walgren, United States of America v. Patrick GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. State v. RandeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. United States v. Norbert A. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  5. Dickson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. State v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. State v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API