Legal Opinion

State v. Rundquist

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 16, 1995No. 16756-5-IIPublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

Michael G. Rundquist was charged with six counts of knowingly purchasing unlawfully taken salmon and six counts of knowingly purchasing unlawfully taken steelhead. After three days of testimony in a jury trial, the trial court interrupted the State’s case-in-chief and dismissed all charges on the ground that outrageous conduct by the government agents had deprived the defendant of his right to due process of law. The court also held that the government had entrapped the defendant into committing the offense. We hold that the governmental conduct was not so outrageous as to shock the sense of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Rafael Santana and Francis FuentesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. State v. BlackwellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. SisouvanhWashington Supreme Court · 2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API