Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Verizon California, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
I
Our state’s family leave act 1 allows employees in firms over a certain size to have up to 12 weeks off a year to care for an immediate family member with a “serious health condition,” or simply because of the employee’s own serious health condition. 2 The right is for time off without fear of losing one’s job, 3 but not necessarily paid time off. The family leave act is quite explicit that, with one exception, an employer is not required to pay for time off for leave taken under the act.
The one exception is if the employee would have the right to be paid for the time…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Haney v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bluford v. Safeway Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Neisendorf v. Levi Strauss & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sciborski v. Pacific Bell DirectoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bluford v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.