Legal Opinion
Bricker v. Rockwell International Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 25, 1993No. 91-36153PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY.
ORDER
The opinion filed October 25, 1993 is amended by inserting the following passage at p. 879, immediately before the section heading entitled “Nondelegation Doctrine”:
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for an en banc rehearing, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. RApp.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is rejected.
OPINION
CANBY, Circuit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Edwin L. Bricker v. Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- (PC) Bradford v. CeballosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Cruz v. BakerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PC) Gradford v. VelascoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.