Legal Opinion

Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 22, 2004No. 21603-9-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKato, C.J.

Steven M. Korslund, Virginia A. Miller, and John Acosta appeal the dismissal of their claims against DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc., (DynCorp) and Fluor Daniel Hanford, Inc. (Fluor), arising from their allegations of safety violations, mismanagement, and fraud at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. Mr. Korslund and Ms. Miller contend they were constructively discharged in violation of public policy. All three plaintiffs contend that, even if they were not constructively discharged, they have presented a valid claim for wrongful retaliation. They also contend they have presented facts to make…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. English v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Havens v. C & D PLASTICS, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Wilmot v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1991

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kirby v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API