Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 25, 1974No. 73 1473PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.

After being charged with first degree robbery, ORS 164.415, and being an ex-convict in possession of a concealable firearm, ORS 166.270, defendant moved to suppress evidence seized during a search of his person and automobile. The state moved for an order summarily denying the motion on the ground that the motion was vague and conclusory. The trial court agreed with the state and, without holding an evidentiary hearing on the motion, denied it. Defendant was convicted on both charges and now appeals, claiming it was error to not afford him an evidentiary hearing on his motion to suppress.

This…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. GossNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. EsguerraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API