Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Shindler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1994No. 93-1546PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNugent, J.

The issue presented for our review is to what extent a motion to suppress evidence must set forth its legal and factual bases in order to require a hearing.

Crim.R. 47 provides:

“An application to the court for an order shall be by motion. A motion, other than one made during trial or hearing, shall be in writing unless the court permits it to be made orally. It shall state with particularity the grounds upon which it is made and shall set forth the relief or order sought. It shall be supported by a memorandum containing citations of authority, and may also be supported by an affidavit.
“To…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. MendozaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. City of Xenia v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. PeaglerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CodeluppiOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. Martin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API