Mills v. Hayden
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
Respondents, as plaintiffs, instituted this action against the. defendants to recover upon eleven bank checks drawn by the defendant William Hayden to the order of G. A. Clark, each being in the form of the usual bank check, except that on the margin of each of the checks there was endorsed on the lower left-hand corner “For F. Burdick, picker,” “Williams, orchard foreman,” “Olive, sorter,” and the like, indicating that the check or its proceeds was intended for the person named in such endorsement. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the aggregate *68amount of the several checks, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- First Denton National Bank v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Batchelder v. Central National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Eyrich v. Capital State BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
- Gray v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Vaughn v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sieling v. SielingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Jones v. EndslowCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1936