Arp & Hammond Hardware Co. v. Hammond Packing Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Burgess, District Judge.
The Arp and Hammond Hardware Company, plaintiff below and respondent here, obtained a judgment in the District Court of Albany County against the Hammond Packing Company, defendant below and appellant here. To review this judgment the packing company brings the ease here by direct appeal.
The recovery was upon nine promissory notes given by the packing company to the hardware company but we are concerned here with only three of them, the other six having been eliminated from our consideration by the brief of counsel for the appellant. The three notes in controversy are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Frank v. HicksWyoming Supreme Court · 1894
- Mining Co. v. Anglo-Californian BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Ganceart v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cooley v. FrankWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Palmetto v. Lumber Co. v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Carter v. DavisonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- King v. GiblinWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Mountain-Lakes Poultry Farms, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.