King v. Giblin

Rester, District Judge.

It has been agreed by counsel for the parties to these two cases before this court on direct appeal that the facts and law governing both are substantially the same. Briefs were filed in No. 1356, King y. Giblin et al., and it Was stipulated that they should be adopted as the briefs of the parties in Case No. 1355, Rafferty v. Giblin, et al. An examination of the several records discloses that counsel have accurately presented the situation in these cases and both can and will be disposed of by this opinion.

For convenience Case No. 1356, supra, in which the briefs were…