Legal Opinion

Wheeler & Miller Shelford, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 31, 1965No. C.D. 2521PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case was limited at the trial to items described on the invoice as follows:

3047 Rattan Peel Tub Chair

3361-B Child’s.Tub Chair, varnished

3362-B Child’s Arm Chair, varnished

These items were imported from Hong Kong and entered at the port of San Francisco on August 15, 1957. They were assessed with duty at 27 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 409 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, as furniture wholly or in chief value of rattan.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeberger v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. United States v. BernardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. MeadowsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Vandergrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Rune Nicklasson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API