Larkey v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was instituted to quiet title to lot 22 of block 21 of the Arlington Heights Tract, according to the official map of said tract of record in the office of the county recorder of the county of Los Angeles, and to a strip of land six feet in width and 142 feet in length, lying immediately north of and parallel to said lot 22. The defendant, the city of Los Angeles, concedes that plaintiff is the owner of said lot 22, but asserts that said six-foot strip is part of a public alley and that defendant has an easement in and over the same for highway purposes.
On. May 19, 1887, and for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Berton v. All Persons, Etc.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. WorleySupreme Court of Florida · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Manhattan Beach v. CortelyouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Hanshaw v. Long Valley Road Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Russell v. Russell County Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Ratchford v. County of SonomaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gross v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.