Legal Opinion

Becker v. Capwell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiff filed this action at law to recover alleged “secret profits” from, the defendant, who was plaintiff’s agent and a real estate broker. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals.

On June 3, 1969, the defendant purchased certain property known as the Lancaster property. ① Defendant was an experienced real estate broker who worked as a consultant for clients on an ongoing basis. His services consisted of the purchase, sale and exchange of investment real property on behalf of his clients.

The plaintiff, a medical doctor with no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Prall v. GOODEN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Thimsen v. ReigardOregon Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lindemeier v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Saga Enterprises, Inc. v. Coldwell, Banker & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Astra USA, Inc. v. BildmanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  5. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API