Becker v. Capwell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
Plaintiff filed this action at law to recover alleged “secret profits” from, the defendant, who was plaintiff’s agent and a real estate broker. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit, and plaintiff appeals.
On June 3, 1969, the defendant purchased certain property known as the Lancaster property. ① Defendant was an experienced real estate broker who worked as a consultant for clients on an ongoing basis. His services consisted of the purchase, sale and exchange of investment real property on behalf of his clients.
The plaintiff, a medical doctor with no…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kilbourn v. SunderlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Prall v. GOODEN ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Thimsen v. ReigardOregon Supreme Court · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Lindemeier v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Saga Enterprises, Inc. v. Coldwell, Banker & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Astra USA, Inc. v. BildmanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992