Thimsen v. Reigard
Oregon Supreme Court
From Coos: J ohn S. Coke, Judge. Department 2. The plaintiff, Katharine Thimsen, brought this suit against Charles I. Reigard and Fannie L. Reigard, his wife, seeking to have defendants declared to be trustees for plaintiff of a portion of certain lands and shares of stock standing in their names. Plaintiff also instituted a suit against the Reigards and the Laurel Investment Company to compel an accounting and restoration to the company of certain moneys and property.
Read the full summary
From Coos: J ohn S. Coke, Judge. Department 2. The plaintiff, Katharine Thimsen, brought this suit against Charles I. Reigard and Fannie L. Reigard, his wife, seeking to have defendants declared to be trustees for plaintiff of a portion of certain lands and shares of stock standing in their names. Plaintiff also instituted a suit against the Reigards and the Laurel Investment Company to compel an accounting and restoration to the company of certain moneys and property. Issues were made and the two suits were consolidated and tried as one, by consent of counsel for the parties. The trial court…
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
After reading the testimony we find that the record discloses the following facts: During the time of the transactions in question in this suit, Kath*47arine Thimsen, the plaintiff, was a resident of the State of Minnesota, and had never been in the county of Coos, Oregon. The defendant, Charles I. Reigard, was an attorney at law and had done some business for plaintiff’s family, in Minnesota, where he resided until about 1910. On January 18, 1910, Mr. Reigard had visited Coos Bay and procured two options to purchase two 40-acre tracts of land from the Archer Land Company for $4,000 each, or a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Michoud v. GirodSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
- The Distilled SpiritsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- McIntire v. PryorSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Templeton v. BocklerOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Sandoval v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Fink v. WeismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Oliphant v. FrenchOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Simpson v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- Van Stee v. RansfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.