Legal Opinion

Hagman v. Webber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

On August 31, 1921, the defendant, as party of the first part, and the plaintiff, as party of the second part, executed the following contract, omitting signatures:

“This contract and agreement drawn this 31st day of August, 1921, between H. W. Weber, the party of the first part, and Andy Hagman, party of the second part, to do certain work specified below on the California State Highway, known as headquarters camp.
“The party of the first part agrees to pay the party of the second part 65‡ per cubic yard for all rock delivered to the crusher of said H. W. Webber’s quarry but said rock not to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ArmentroutAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1931
  2. MacVeagh v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Lea v. BloklandOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. BaucomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Hagman v. WebberOregon Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API