People v. Armentrout
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, J., pro tem.
In three complaints the five defendants were charged with the violation of two sections *764of what is known as the Los Angeles city “anti-picketing” ordinance (Ord. No. 20,586 N. S.). The first count of each of these complaints charged violation of section 1 through the making of loud and unusual noises for the purpose of inducing, influencing and attempting to induce and influence, persons to refrain from entering the Rialto Theater at 812 South Broadway, in the city of Los Angeles. Defendants Thomas W. Armentrout, Joseph P. Dufrane, and James Doyle are charged with the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- American Steel Foundries v. Tri-City Central Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Magill Bros. v. Building Service Employees' International UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Northwestern Pacific Railroad v. Lumber & Sawmill Workers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.