Legal Opinion

Hagman v. Webber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1926Published

1Opinion

On Petition eor Rehearing.

(244 Pac. 83.)

COSHOW, J.

The defendant has presented a very earnest petition for rehearing alleging error in our opinion because we did not hold that defendant was entitled to damages for plaintiff’s breach of his alleged contract to deliver 8,000 yards of rock. Defendant says in his petition:

“We do not care, as we said on oral argument, whether the contract is reformed or not. We offered parol evidence to prove the exact amount of rock that was to be delivered. The evidence was admitted without objections, and, under American Contract Co. v. Bullen Bridge Co. was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winn v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ferguson v. Rafferty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1889
  3. Wallace v. American Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. American Contract Co. v. Bullen Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hagman v. WebberOregon Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API