Legal Opinion
State v. Dahlk
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 10, 1983No. 81-1681-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
Defendant was convicted in a jury trial of violating sec. 945.04(1), Stats., permitting real estate under his control to be used as a gambling place. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion to dismiss the amended complaint. We affirm.
Defendant raises the following issues :
1. Should the state have been allowed to amend its complaint?
2. Were the allegations of the amended complaint sufficient ?
3. Is sec. 945.04(1), Stats., unconstitutionally vague and overbroad ?
4. Was the evidence sufficient for a guilty verdict ?
5. Did the trial court err when instructing…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. RabeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ZwickerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. CollovaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Cullen v. CeciWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hemerley v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte Ted's Game EnterprisesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- State v. NixaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.