Legal Opinion

State v. Connard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1986No. 8527SC1249PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

In his first assignment of error defendant challenges the court’s ruling denying his motion to suppress. He argues that authorization to search for “stolen goods” violated constitutional requirements that warrants particularly describe the object(s) of the search, and that police thereby engaged in an unlawful “fishing expedition” through his house and van.

A

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires, in the absence of consent or exigent circumstances, that searches be conducted pursuant to warrant. Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204, 68 L.Ed. 2d 38,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LodermeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. FloydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. MayseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. SchmitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API