Legal Opinion

Kelleher v. First Presbyterian Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although defendants and third-party defendant employer each may have a duty to insure that plaintiff has a safe place to work, that duty does not, under the factual circumstances of this case, arise under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see, Staples v Town of Amherst, 146 AD2d 292). Thus, Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment against the owner, lessee and excavator on the issue of liability under section 240 (1) and properly granted the excavator’s motion for dismissal of plaintiffs’ section 240 (1) claim. However, the court erred in not dismissing the section 240 (1)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Long v. Forest-FehlhaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Copertino v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. DaBolt v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Nagel v. MetzgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rapp v. Zandri Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Leon v. J & M Peppe Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Drago v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Tooher v. Willets Point Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Root v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API