Legal Opinion
Kroll v. Windsor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 16, 1960No. 38,041Published
1Opinion of the Court
259 Minn. 200 (1960)
107 N.W. (2d) 53
DOROTHY W. KROLL
v.
CURT WINDSOR, ALSO KNOWN AS CURTIS H. WINDSOR, JR.
No. 38,041.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
December 16, 1960.
Samuel G. Smilow, for appellant.
John C. DeMoss, for respondent.
LOEVINGER, JUSTICE.
Suit for recovery of money loaned, plus interest, in which usury is asserted as a defense.
Defendant sought a loan of $2,000 from the plaintiff. About the same time, plaintiff transferred certain lots to a third party for $3,900, concurrently signing a contract for deed to repurchase the same lots in 6 months for $4,850, plus 5-percent interest. Out of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stevens v. StaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Rantala v. HaishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. BuelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Linne v. RonkainenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Kroll v. WindsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.