Legal Opinion

Linne v. Ronkainen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1949No. 34,862PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for amended findings or a new trial.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover on a promissory note, made, executed, and delivered by defendant to plaintiff on August 1, 1943. The note was in the following form: ■

“$200.00 Duluth, Minn. August 1, 1943
“For value received I promise to pay to the order of E. P. Linne, the herein stipulated amount at the place designated by holder hereof.
“If default is made in the payment of any of the stipulated installments provided to be paid according to- the terms…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Patterson v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. Strickland v. First State Bank of BalatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Blindman v. Industrial Loan & Thrift Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Egbert v. PetersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Morse v. WellcomeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Citizen's National Bank of Willmar v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Crince v. KulzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 14 v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Kroll v. WindsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API