Legal Opinion

Kroll v. Windsor

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1960No. 38,041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loevinger, Justice.

Suit for recovery of money loaned, plus interest, in which usury is asserted as a defense.

Defendant sought a loan of $2,000 from the plaintiff. About the same time, plaintiff transferred certain lots to a third party for $3,900, concurrently .signing a contract for deed to repurchase the same lots in 6 months for $4,850, plus 5-percent interest. Out of this $3,900, plaintiff loaned $2,000 to defendant upon an agreement that defendant should repay $2,450 in 6 months, plus 5-percent interest.

When defendant failed to repay plaintiff, suit was brought for $2,450 plus interest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stevens v. StaplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Rantala v. HaishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Adjustment Service Bureau, Inc. v. BuelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Linne v. RonkainenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Allroggen v. A. C. Carter & Northeast Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. VanderWeyst v. First State Bank of BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. CBS Real Estate of Cedar Rapids, Inc. v. HarperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Kroll v. WindsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. VanderWeyst v. First State Bank of BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API