Legal Opinion

Sharon Realty Co. v. Westlake

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1961No. 6818PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryant, J.

The sole question before the court at this time arises upon the motion of plaintiff, appellee herein, which reads as follows:

“Now comes the plaintiff-appellee herein, by its counsel, and moves the court for an order dismissing the appeal herein as an appeal on questions of law and fact for the reason that no bond has been given by the appellants, as required by statute, ■ o qualify for an appeal on questions of law and fact. The time for giving such bond is long since passed.”

In the petition filed in the court below, the plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, appellee herein, described itself as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. GambleOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Youngs'nOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hickey v. Burke, MayorOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Wolf v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph Skillken & Co. v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Joseph Skillken and Co. v. City of Toledo, and Ragan Woods Homeowners Association, Inc., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. Joseph Skillken and Company v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API