Legal Opinion

Wolf v. City of Columbus

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1954No. 5175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J;

This cause is here on a motion submitted by the plaintiff, appellee herein, seeking an order dismissing the appeal on questions of law and fact for the reason that no appeal bond has been filed as required by Section 2505.06, Revised Code. It is urged by the defendants that the city of Columbus, one of the defendants, is a political subdivision, that the other two defendants are officers of a political subdivision, and that an appeal bond may not be required, citing Section 2505.12, Revised Code, which provides that an appeal bond shall not be required from:

“(B) The state and any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Akron (City) v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Steubenville (city) v. ReinerOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fair v. School Employees Retirement SystemOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Sharon Realty Co. v. WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Crane v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Ex Parte Martinez, Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API