Cole v. Rush
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
40 Cal.2d 178 (1953)
DOROTHEA COLE et al., Appellants,
v.
PAUL RUSH et al., Defendants; FRANK VAN STONE, Respondent.
L. A. No. 22358.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Jan. 20, 1953.
John C. Stevenson and Lionel Richman for Appellants.
Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and A. P. G. Steffes for Respondent.
THE COURT.
[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Such an order is nonappealable (Evans v. Dabney (1951), 37 Cal.2d 758, 759 [235 P.2d 604], and authorities there cited; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 476), and this court must, therefore, dismiss the appeal of its own…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Evans v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Rosenberg v. KnesboroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
3Cited by21 opinions
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. ClausenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.