Legal Opinion

Cole v. Rush

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1953No. L. A. No. 22358PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

40 Cal.2d 178 (1953)

DOROTHEA COLE et al., Appellants,

v.

PAUL RUSH et al., Defendants; FRANK VAN STONE, Respondent.

L. A. No. 22358.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Jan. 20, 1953.

John C. Stevenson and Lionel Richman for Appellants.

Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and A. P. G. Steffes for Respondent.

THE COURT.

[1] This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend. Such an order is nonappealable (Evans v. Dabney (1951), 37 Cal.2d 758, 759 [235 P.2d 604], and authorities there cited; 3 Cal.Jur.2d 476), and this court must, therefore, dismiss the appeal of its own…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. CorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Evans v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Rosenberg v. KnesboroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People Ex Rel. Dep't of Pub. Works v. ClausenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API