Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Townsend

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1951No. Civ. 14741PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, P. J.—

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not appealable. The pertinent dates are as follows:

June 21, 1950—cause called for trial. The minutes of the court for that day show that the attorney for the plaintiffs “objected to the fact that no jury was in attendance despite his request for one, said objection being made for the record. Motion denied. . . . (The trial then proceeded.) ...”

July 1, 1950—plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal “from that certain order made and entered by the Court in this action on the 21st day of June, 1950,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holden v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Stern v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. In re Estate of RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Mutual Bldg. & Loan Ass'n of Long Beach v. CorumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Lopez v. Emergency Service Restoration, Inc. (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Evola v. Wendt Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Beazell v. SchraderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Pacific Motor Trucking Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API