Harmon v. INNOMED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.
Kevin C. Harmon appeals the grant of summary judgment against him in this lawsuit, wherein he claims ownership of certain intellectual property purchased by Innomed Technologies, Inc. We review de novo a trial court’s grant of summary judgment, construing the evidence in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party.1 Because Harmon has demonstrated no reversible error, we affirm.
In 1996, Thomas J. Wood obtained a patent in connection with a nasal ventilation device he had invented. The patent was held by a company wholly owned by Wood. Years later, in late 1998, Wood…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Bunting v. McDonnell Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Burns v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Pine Valley Apartments Ltd. Partnership v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Demer v. Capital City Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Albertson v. City of JesupCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- BD. OF COM'RS OF PUTNAM COUNTY v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Cancel v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- HA&W Capital Partners, LLC v. BhandariCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- A.D.A. v. XYTEX CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.