Legal Opinion
Latson v. Boaz
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 28, 2004No. S03G1204PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
Darrell and Carolyn Boaz (husband and wife) sued attorney William Latson for fraud, fraudulent foreclosure, and slander of title. Latson’s subsequent motion for summary judgment was granted as to all counts on the basis that the various claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitation. The Court of Appeals reversed as to the fraudulent foreclosure and slander of title claims, reasoning that those claims were not time-barred. Boaz v. Latson, 260 Ga. App. 752 (580 SE2d 572) (2003) (physical precedent only). We granted certiorari and hold that summary judgment should…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Hewett v. KalishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Cheeley v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Daniels v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Norton v. BUDGET RENT a CAR SYSTEM, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Selvy v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Insight Technology, Inc. v. FREIGHTCHECK, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Hamburger v. PFM Capital Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Knight v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.