Legal Opinion
United States v. Specialist BENJAMIN C. HILL
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided October 19, 2012No. ARMY MISC 20120755PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 62, UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
MARTIN, Judge:
Appellee is charged with two specifications of violating a lawful general regulation for hazing, two specifications of aggravated sexual contact, and two specifications of housebreaking with the intent to commit aggra vated sexual contact therein, in violation of Articles 92, 120, and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 920, 930 (2006 & Supp. IV 2010) [hereinafter UCMJ]. During a pretrial motion hearing, the military judge found there…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CatanoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015
- United States v. CatanoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015