United States v. Khadr
United States Court of Military Commission Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON APPEAL BY THE UNITED STATES FILED PURSUANT TO 10 U.S.C. § 950d
FRANCIS, Deputy Chief Judge:
This case is before us on an interlocutory appeal by the Government [hereinafter Appellant], pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 950d. Appellant contends the military judge erred as a matter of law when he struck certain portions of Charge III and its Specification as surplus language beyond that necessary to allege the statutory offense of conspiracy. We hold the appeal to be untimely, and accordingly dismiss it as beyond the appellate jurisdiction of the Court.
Background
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Steven BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2014