United States v. Al-Nashiri
United States Court of Military Commission Review
1Opinion of the Court
PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The military judge dismissed Specification 2 of Charge TV (Terrorism), Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), Charge VIII (Attacking Civilian Objects), and Charge IX (Hijacking or Hazarding a Vessel or Aircraft) without prejudice. Appellant filed an interlocutory appeal under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(l) because the military judge’s order “terminates proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge *1306or specification.” See 2012 Manual for Military Commissions (MMC), Rule for Military Commission (R.M.C.) 908(a)(1). That appeal is now before us.
On September 23,…
3Cases cited30 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
- United States v. Al-NashiriSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2018