Legal Opinion

United States v. Al-Nashiri

United States Court of Military Commission Review

Decided October 10, 2014No. CMCR 14-001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The military judge dismissed Specification 2 of Charge TV (Terrorism), Charge VII (Attacking Civilians), Charge VIII (Attacking Civilian Objects), and Charge IX (Hijacking or Hazarding a Vessel or Aircraft) without prejudice. Appellant filed an interlocutory appeal under 10 U.S.C. § 950d(a)(l) because the military judge’s order “terminates proceedings of the military commission with respect to a charge *1306or specification.” See 2012 Manual for Military Commissions (MMC), Rule for Military Commission (R.M.C.) 908(a)(1). That appeal is now before us.

On September 23,…

3Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. DieterSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. IbarraSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Al-NashiriUnited States Court of Military Commission Review · 2016
  2. United States v. Al-NashiriSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API