Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. Riggs

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2007No. S-12025PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Judy MacDonald sued Jack Riggs for assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The jury found for Riggs on all claims and awarded him $35,000 in damages from MacDonald on his defamation counterclaim. MacDonald appeals the superior court's denial of her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on the counterclaim.

With respect to the three arguments that MacDonald presents, we conclude as follows:(1) there was sufficient evidence regarding defamatory statements by MacDonald to create a jury…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Bryson v. News America Publications, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Nazeri v. Missouri Valley CollegeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  5. Costello v. HardySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. W.J.A. v. D.A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Gail Bierman and Beth Weier v. Scott Weier and Author Solutions, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Jacobson v. LeisingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Greene v. TinkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Pedersen v. BlytheAlaska Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API