State v. Ferrell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
In this driving while under the influence of an impairing substance case, defendant, Paul Graham Ferrell, contends (1) that *157the relevant statute, N.C. Gen. Stat. Sec. 20-138.1(a)(2) (1983), which proscribes driving after consuming sufficient alcohol to have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10% or more at “any relevant time after the driving,” is unconstitutional in that the statute is vague and uncertain, and in that it otherwise violates his substantive due process rights; (2) that the “results of the chemical analysis of the breath should not have been allowed into evidence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Tamara Lenise MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Finney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- United States v. Tamara Lenise MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004